Wednesday, September 26, 2007

Keep it Real

I remember watching something on television where two men were in a bar fight, and a third man stepped in, broke up the fight, and said, “keep it real.” Now, I’d heard this expression many times before, but I hadn’t really contemplated the meaning until that television moment a couple of years ago. I love “keep it real.” To me it means to recognize and honor the humanity that we have in common, to drop our defenses, and to stop posturing—to put down our fists.

I recently had an exchange that wasn’t real. My longtime (20 years) hairdresser and friend, Kim, is going through some hard financial times. Her husband lost his job and the family’s health insurance, her son has been sick, and things seem a little bleak right now. So I pulled the sneak-some-extra-money-in trick, the way old ladies do when they want to help “the kids.” In retrospect, that move may not have come off as I had hoped.

It turned out that because Kim was rushing Mira’s haircut to fit in extra clients, the haircut came out a little crooked. I called her the next day to make arrangements to get Mira’s hair fixed. It wasn’t long into the conversation before I was on the end of a daytime-talk-T.V.-style rant about how I think I’m better than her, about how I was talking down to her. She then said, “and I’m going to send you that money back.”

We needed the “keep it real”guy.

I spent too many fruitless minutes trying to explain that I didn’t “have an attitude” and that I wasn’t upset. Kim yelled “I wish all I had to worry about was an eight-year-old’s haircut.” Finally, I ended the call by telling Kim that she had it all wrong and that I couldn’t accept that kind of treatment. I said, “I won’t be back,” and I hung up the phone. I HATE this kind of theater, but she wouldn’t let me speak long enough to end the call properly, and at that point, enough had been said.

Why did money have to complicate things so much? Why was Kim unable to see that money is just money? That human relationships are more important than money? Or was it my fault for sneaking the money. Why was I so uncomfortable with just handing her the money and telling her that I wanted to help? My intentions were to be generous without embarrassing Kim, so on some level, sneaking her the money says that I had to know it was going to offend her.

It was all just so unreal.

But then, when someone who works for tips discusses her overwhelming financial fears with a client, isn’t she kind of asking for money? Wouldn’t it be a little inhuman not to tip more than usual? Or was it the size of the snuck-in tip, twice the cost of the haircuts (or 100%), that was the problem?

And here’s the thing, the real thing—now, after this incident, I do feel better than Kim. I feel superior about the way I handled our conflict. I feel superior that I wasn’t the person who brought up the issue of the money, which, in my opinion, was a little crass.

And if I’m really being real, I have to admit that I arrived at this place of superiority a little too quickly for my own comfort. Because, truth be told, it’s easy for someone who isn’t struggling to support a family with three kids to have a healthier and more spiritual, let’s-just-all-share-it-man attitude about money.

Still, I know that my intentions behind the tip were real, as real as can be. I was connecting with Kim’s money troubles on the most basic of human levels—I knew that it could happen to me at any time. Really, for the typical American family, job loss is not out of the question and serious financial peril is always a possibility. And so I superstitiously felt that by giving Kim a little extra, I could somehow make myself luckier, less likely to suffer a similar reality.

If I could talk to Kim again, this is what I would say. This and, “let’s keep it real.”

Posted by Lucy in 20:40:04
Comments

4 Responses

  1. Mary says:

    I’m sorry things went south like that. I would love to say “she’s just stressed” but I know how much it hurts when something like this happens with someone you love and respect. Or at least really really like. ;)

    I hope that she can see that she spoke out of frustration and anger that really has nothing to do with you.

  2. crse says:

    You know? Its funny how when you read stuff like this written by someone you love and admire your first instinct is to get really mad at the person who was mean to them. (well mine) The thing is, that is my second and third and enduring instinct too. Because it is mean that she did that. And said that. And could not be gracious in the scheme of things. I think the thing i find most troubling about this is that the professional in any professional relationship has a responsibility to BE professional. Gretty was really good for me in terms of understanding that responsibility because she was our professional. And things would be bleak for her. But through the past year she consistently “kept it real” and never ever blurred relationships. We had our sources of conflict but Gret was good about putting it on the table and keeping it about us and not the position. And Lucy, i cant help but think it was Kim’s responsibility to handle that more professionally. Oh man i could go on and on and on. but its your blog baby!

  3. Lucy says:

    Crse, You’re the best. Actually, Nina said pretty much the same thing that you did, only she added that Kim needed to examine her own agenda re: the money. I was trying to be spiritual and compassionate–the high road–but I have since drunk the “haterade” and I’m feeling much more snarky and arrogant about the whole exchange. However, I’ve also pretty much moved on. But you’re right, she was completely unprofessional, and I should have called her on it instead of worrying so much about how I might have hurt her feelings.

  4. carp says:

    I feel your writing competence very good, and can we be friends?

Leave a Reply